Jiri Lehecka vs Miomir Kecmanovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Dec at 05:32 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Lehecka vs M. Kecmanovic

CZE
0
Win
Played
1
Win

SRB
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Lehecka 0 - 1 Kecmanovic
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jiri Lehecka winning 0 and Miomir Kecmanovic winning 2. The last match between Miomir Kecmanovic and Jiri Lehecka was at the Banja Luka Open - Banja Luka, 21-04-2023, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Miomir Kecmanovic getting the victory 7-5 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Lehecka | 0 |
| Kecmanovic | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) Banja Luka Open - Banja Luka(04-21-23)
J. Lehecka vs M. Kecmanovic H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $5,042,880 | Career Prize Money | $5,218,780 |
| 61.07% (251-160) | Career Total W/L | 55.98% (323-254) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 8 | Titles | 7 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 64.06% (41-23) | YTD Win/Loss | 46.15% (24-28) |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 1 |
J. Lehecka vs M. Kecmanovic Match Preview:
- In recent form, Jiri Lehecka has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 47.61% of points compared to Miomir Kecmanovic's 43.74%. Does this give Lehecka an advantage? It might, but other factors are also crucial.
- Miomir Kecmanovic shows stronger return game stats, winning 49.72% of second serve returns, surpassing Lehecka's 41.14%. Could this serve-return ability swing the match in his favor?
- When evaluating breakpoint under pressure, Lehecka leads slightly by saving 57.63% of breakpoints over Kecmanovic's 50.90%. This skill is often a critical determinant in tight matches.
- Performance over the last 12 months shows Jiri Lehecka winning 64.06% of his matches, a superior record to Miomir Kecmanovic’s 48.28%. Is Lehecka's overall form more reliable?
- Considering surface preference, Kecmanovic excels on clay with a 60% win rate, while Lehecka’s best is on hard courts, also at 60%. Does surface type impact this specific match?
- Lehecka displays stronger form on the Main tour, winning 70% of his matches in the past year versus Kecmanovic's 50%. Is this a sign of higher competitive play from Lehecka?
- In direct encounters, Kecmanovic has dominated, winning 1 out of 1 match with Jiri Lehecka. Does this head-to-head record continue to suggest Kecmanovic has Lehecka's measure?
- When matches extend into a deciding set, both players show similar records, with Kecmanovic winning 43% and Lehecka 44% in these situations. Does this say anything significant about their endurance and mental resilience?
Editorial Prediction (December 22, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent performance metrics, each player brings distinct strengths to the upcoming match. Jiri Lehecka shows superior second serve effectiveness, a critical asset in maintaining pressure during service games.
Conversely, Miomir Kecmanovic's ability to excel in return games suggests he could seize opportunities to break, especially on Jiri’s second serves. His impressive track record on clay adds another layer of complexity, as does his head-to-head superiority over Lehecka.
Jiri Lehecka's higher win percentage on the Main tour indicates a consistent level of play against top-level competition, hinting at adaptability and current form. However, Kecmanovic’s proven success in direct contests cannot be overlooked.
Considering these factors, Miomir Kecmanovic appears slightly more poised to take command of the match, especially if he capitalizes on return opportunities. Ultimately, while both players have compelling cases, Kecmanovic's consistency on clay and head-to-head edge suggest he might emerge victorious in this tennis battle.
Jiri Lehecka vs Miomir Kecmanovic Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Lehecka vs M. Kecmanovic H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 5 | Games Won | 13 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:33:3 | Average Match Time | 1:33:3 |
| 56% (32/57) | 1st Serve % | 67% (49/73) |
| 44% (14/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 53% (26/49) |
| 32% (8/25) | 2nd Serve Win % | 63% (15/24) |
| 25% (3/12) | Break Pts Won % | 44% (7/16) |
| 44% (32/73) | Return Points Win % | 61% (35/57) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Lehecka Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Rubber 2 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
F | L | 7-6(2) 6-7(6) 6-2 | ||
SF | W | 7-6(3) 7-6(7) | ||
M. Kecmanovic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(4) 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 1-6 7-6(4) | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 1-6 7-6(2) | ||

J. Lehecka vs M. Kecmanovic Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.07% (251/160) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.98% (323/254) |
| 58.22% (581/417) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.49% (776/648) |
| 52.57% (5070/4574) | Games Win/Loss | 51.95% (7111/6576) |
| 64.06% (82/46) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.18% (141/110) |
| 62.96% (102/60) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.19% (124/82) |
| 55.00% (55/45) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (40/40) |
| 57.14% (12/9) | Grass Win/Loss | 45.00% (18/22) |
| 0.46 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 2167 | Aces Total | 2116 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 946 | Total Double Faults | 1159 |
| 1:39:42 | Average Match Time | 1:40:57 |
| 299.73 | Average Opponent Rank | 340.08 |
| 63% (18859/29706) | 1st Serve % | 60% (25015/41358) |
| 71% (13460/18859) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (17551/25015) |
| 52% (5619/10847) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (8654/16338) |
| 41% (1100/2682) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (1595/3907) |
| 38% (11073/29345) | Return Points Win % | 38% (16156/42193) |
| 63.41% (26/15) | Slam W/L | 50.79% (32/31) |
| 50.00% (26/26) | Masters W/L | 40.22% (37/55) |
| 61.11% (11/7) | Cups W/L | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 60.68% (71/46) | Main Tour W/L | 54.09% (119/101) |
| 62.16% (69/42) | Challenger W/L | 62.37% (58/35) |
| 66.67% (48/24) | Futures W/L | 72.63% (69/26) |
| 61% (221/363) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (288/512) |
| 62% (24/39) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (29/58) |
| 52% (81/155) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (115/248) |
| 56% (72/129) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (92/184) |
| 85% (253/214) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (342/277) |
| 15% (253/39) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (342/65) |
| 24% (156/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (235/46) |
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Tien Vs Blockx H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Tien Vs Basavareddy H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Blockx Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Tien Vs Kjaer H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?

Prediction Of Landaluce Vs Jodar H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Next Gen Atp Finals Presented By Pif 2025?
